No Content Set
Exception:
Website.Models.ViewModels.Components.General.Banners.BannerComponentVm

Truer-to-life testing

Still shot of helmet testing

Impact testing at Team Wendy

The function of the helmet

Protective helmets must mitigate a wide range of impact forces, from low-energy sub-concussive blunt impacts to more serious falls and collisions.

First, a quick review. The human body possesses kinetic energy when in motion. Energy scatters if it comes into contact with another force or object. It’s the helmet that helps absorb this kinetic energy upon impact rather than letting your head (and subsequently your brain) take the brunt of the force. In ballistic cases, the helmet shell is designed to catch the bullet (with performance varying by model and defined by its V50 rating— as determined through ballistic testing).

It's important to review the specific V50 performance of each helmet, as this metric directly reflects its ballistic resistance. The hard foam inside the helmet then helps absorb the residual energy from the impact. Additional soft foam padding provides comfort and cushion.

How does a helmet mitigate blunt impact?

Blunt impact occurs when an object directly strikes the head, transferring force that can affect the brain even without penetrating the skull. For example, falling and hitting your head on the ground can cause significant injury. The severity of this type of impact is closely tied to how quickly the head decelerates upon contact—the faster the stop, the greater the force transmitted to the brain. In contrast, ballistic impacts involve small, high-velocity projectiles like bullets, which pose a different kind of threat due to their speed and concentrated energy.

Beyond blunt and ballistic threats, helmets must also contend with blast-related dangers. Explosions from improvised explosive devices (IEDs), breaching charges, or other blasts generate shockwaves that can cause primary blast injuries—pressure wave effects that may contribute to brain trauma. Additionally, secondary injuries from flying debris (ballistic) and tertiary injuries from being thrown into objects (blunt) further highlight the complex protective role helmets must play in high-threat environments.

Graphic of brain in yellow

Team Wendy’s chemists and engineers test impact responses of foams and other impact mitigating structures in order to improve the protective capabilities of our helmet liners across a range of impact velocities. We design and formulate the foam chemistry in house with varying responses and conduct impact and compression testing both independently of a helmet and as a full system to analyze their stress-strain response allowing us to model how the system will respond to a variety of inputs.

Ballistic threats present an entirely different energy mitigation challenge. Team Wendy has been involved in many R&D efforts to design and adapt novel helmet liner materials to ballistic helmets and better understand how optimization can limit trauma. Through a USSOCOM BAA funded research effort, we refined padding materials to minimize force transfer to the skull – working with kinetic energy levels that could previously be mitigated only by the hard-outer shell of the helmet.

Man in cap working with machinary

To advance our understanding of how helmets can protect against primary blast-induced brain injuries, we’ve conducted live blast testing using advanced prototypical headforms that simulate real-world conditions. As part of the US Army’s Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program, we also performed shock tube testing on helmet liner materials to evaluate their response to blast waves. Additionally, we facilitated a panel discussion with leading experts to explore the latest research and innovations in mitigating blast-related brain trauma.

Truer-to-life testing

The long-established method for determining a helmet’s protection against a blunt impact is to test it using a uniaxial drop tower. This, essentially, tests straight-ahead impact which does not reflect the entirety of a real-world scenario, specifically missing angular/rotational impacts which are important to mitigate TBI. Of course, we have this equipment to perform the testing in house, however we have made major changes and advances in how we test a helmet’s performance against blunt impact over the years.

When real-world impacts occur, the head can undergo complex motions. Angular or rotational movement in particular is increasingly known to play a role in straining brain tissue. By considering such events, we aim to improve a helmet’s ability to mitigate concussions.

Team Wendy continues to conduct internal and independent testing to understand how helmet and liner designs can lessen rotational accelerations. Under a grant from the Office of Naval Research, we partner with several universities and research groups to analyze the cellular mechanisms of mTBI and link cellular response to the kinematics of head impact. As a part of this ongoing research, we have developed new testing methods that incorporate real world impacts and account for rotational movement to ultimately design better helmets offering real-world protection.

Helmet on dummy head attached to testing rig

Material technology

Team Wendy formulates and manufactures our own polyurethane foams utilized in our helmets specifically for impact mitigation and energy absorption.